Stop finding out about import-rule changes after they cost you money.

The failure mode both monitors share

A compliance break is not an outage. An outage announces itself: the page throws a 500, the dashboard goes red, somebody gets paged at 3am. Regulatory and platform breaks behave in the opposite way, and that is precisely what makes them expensive.

Shopify stripped legacy checkout scripts on Aug 26, 2026. Storefronts kept converting. The only thing that changed was what Meta received. CPSC certificate eFiling through ACE went mandatory on Jul 8, 2026, and a packet missing a required element does not come back to the importer with a correction request, it holds the shipment. The Bureau of Industry and Security closed its comment window on 14 proposed Section 232 derivative-article categories on Aug 27, 2026; importers who were not reading the Federal Register that month learned about the list once it was already final.

Three properties turn this class of failure into money:

• It is silent. The system that changed has no reason to notify you, because from its own point of view nothing is broken. It is doing exactly what its new rules say.
• It is dated. Somebody published the change on a specific day, in the Federal Register, an agency notice, or a developer changelog. The information was public. You were not reading that day.
• It compounds. Ad budget keeps spending against bad attribution. Port dwell fees accrue per day. Duty exposure applies to every entry filed after the effective date, not just the next one.

Watching for all of this by hand is a real job: read the Federal Register, track platform changelogs, re-verify your own configuration on a schedule, and know which of the three matters this quarter. It is worth doing. Most operators below roughly $50M in revenue have nobody assigned to it, and the general-purpose compliance platforms built for the companies that do assign someone start at enterprise pricing and take weeks to configure. Each product below is a narrow, deterministic slice of that job instead.

What the three actually share

Deterministic, never generative, at scan time

Every scan is a rules engine. The same inputs produce the same output every time, and each finding traces back to a rule that can be read line by line. No language model runs at scan time anywhere in the portfolio. Models appear only in optional drafts, such as a BIS comment letter or an alert email, and you read and edit those before anything leaves your hands. A scanner that told you a different thing about your own store on Tuesday than it did on Monday would be worse than no scanner.

The free check is the entire first step

Each product's front door is a scan that runs without an account: paste a store URL, upload a sample CSV, enter an HTS code. It answers one question, which is whether you have exposure. If the answer is no, that is a useful answer, and it cost you nothing to get it.

One login for both monitors

The products bill separately and each runs standalone, so nothing forces you to adopt more than one. They do share a single account, which means store details and HTS codes entered on one side are available to the others rather than being retyped.

Primary sources, cited where the claim is made

Findings point at the underlying authority: the CFR section, the Federal Register notice, the platform changelog entry. Where a figure comes from an industry-observed range rather than our own measurement, the page says so on the same line as the figure. See the portfolio methodology for how each scanner reaches a verdict, and the public status page for whether the scanners are running right now.

What none of them are

None of these products is a licensed customs broker, a filer of record, a testing laboratory, a compliance certification, or a legal-advice service. Each one reads public regulatory data plus your own configuration and reports what it finds. Filing, classification and compliance decisions stay with your business and your own broker, attorney or advisor. Where a product estimates a cost, the page labels it as an estimate and names the source of the range.

EnforceIntel (Digital Empire Holdings LLC) is also not affiliated with any agency or platform these products monitor, including CPSC, CBP, BIS, the Department of Commerce, USITC, FDA, Meta, Shopify, Amazon, Shein, Temu and TikTok Shop. Those names appear on this page to describe what is being watched, nothing more. Full terms sit on the trust hub, alongside the data processing agreement and security documentation.

Who builds this

Digital Empire Holdings LLC is a Wyoming LLC at 30 N Gould St Ste N, Sheridan WY 82801, founded and run by Andy Gaber. All three products are new. There is no customer roster on this page, no logo wall and no testimonial carousel, because inventing those is the first thing a compliance vendor should refuse to do: a vendor asking you to trust its output about federal filings has no business faking the easy parts. What exists instead is a free scan on each product that you can run in the next two minutes, a written methodology, a changelog, and an email address that reaches the founder, support@enforceintel.com.

The about page covers the LLC, the EIN and the current customer count in more detail than most vendors publish.

Where to go next

• Not sure which oneA short router that points at one of the three. No email required.
• PricingEvery tier across the portfolio on one page, plus the bundle.
• Help centreSetup, integration and troubleshooting articles per product.
• ChangelogWhat shipped, and when.